Populations Digitally Excluded from Education: Issues, Factors, Contributions and Actions for Policy, Practice and Research in a Post-Pandemic Era
Overview4:39CCAI
paperi.ai
0:00 / 0:00
Don Passey, Jean Gabin Ntebutse, Manal Yazbak Abu Ahmad, Janet Cochrane, Simon Collin, Asmaa Ganayem, Elizabeth Langran, Sadaqat Mulla, Ma. Mercedes T. Rodrigo, Toshinori Saito, Miri Shonfeld, Saunand Somasi
A laptop or internet connection can look like a ticket into education. But this paper argues that access alone may leave people just as excluded, because the surrounding choices can quietly reproduce the barriers they were meant to remove.
This conceptual paper draws on a wide range of research and policy literature, providing a contemporary view of issues, factors and practices that affect education for digitally excluded populations. Concern for how education for digitally excluded populations can be supported is focal to this paper, with different sections offering key related perspectives. From an analysis of issues, factors and practices, actions for policy, practice and research are identified. Given a key finding that power issues can have major effects on plans, implementation processes and outcomes when addressing needs of education for digitally excluded populations, the paper concludes by offering frameworks to support and enable key discussions, to involve representatives from an excluded population as well as those from policy (government and industry), practitioners (teachers and learners) and researchers.
Transcript
A laptop or internet connection can look like a ticket into education. But this paper argues that access alone may leave people just as excluded, because the surrounding choices can quietly reproduce the barriers they were meant to remove. The central question is how to include digitally excluded populations, providing access to education and optimizing learning in a post-pandemic era.
Here, digitally excluded populations include people facing limited access or use in particular countries or ethnic groups, remote or rural areas, low-income areas, or among people with disabilities. Digital exclusion existed before the pandemic among populations in rural areas, low-income areas, and ethnically isolated communities.
Although the pandemic encouraged online digital uses, digital exclusion continued in similar populations afterward. So groups trying to address educational digital exclusion need to identify key issues and factors, and use appropriate practices to move forward successfully.
The inclusive potential of digital technologies is often challenged by social, political, and historical contexts that shape those technologies. In practice, unequal access, usage, skills, and outcomes appear between different educational environments and learners.
Digital technologies can therefore perpetuate or amplify existing patterns of inclusion and exclusion, influenced by power structures. Material access to digital resources is an essential first step, but simply providing them does not necessarily lead to meaningful engagement or empowerment.
Think of it like handing someone a key without checking whether the door is reachable, affordable to use, or designed for them. Design, features, and costs can make digital tools inaccessible and unaffordable. Digital access therefore needs to be designed for accessibility, agency, and empowerment, so tools and services work for all people, including people with physical and cognitive disabilities.
The shift toward educational technology made the need for educational inclusion and social-emotional learning more visible. Closures and emergency remote teaching widened gaps in student technology access and teacher readiness. The effects were greatest where differently-abled students and their teachers required specific support, showing that the pandemic affected groups unequally despite shared experiences.
The review identifies key aspects for developing educational digital inclusion with excluded populations and presents them as a framework for answering how to provide access and optimize learning after the pandemic. The framework is intended for people developing educational digital inclusion with excluded populations.
Addressing educational exclusion, digital inequality, and digital divides after the pandemic requires more nuanced approaches to policy, practice, and research. Factors and contributions should be considered more holistically, importantly involving excluded populations together with people in policy, practice, and research.
Shared discussions among the four stakeholder groups should identify and agree on the factors to address and the contributions to make. Digital inclusion in education cannot be solved by technology alone: this table maps shared responsibilities across policy, practice, research, and the people affected, from infrastructure and accessibility to privacy, culture, skills, and changing needs over time.
The framework is intended to support more effective implementation processes for addressing educational digital exclusion. Power structures can play a key role that is both negative and unintended. The paper offers frameworks to address this potential issue and help guide more effective implementation processes for digitally excluded populations.
The factors and contributions should inform planning and implementation from the outset, rather than being considered later, because delaying them is often counter-productive. For someone shut out of online education, that means inclusion is not a final adjustment after a system is built; their experience needs to shape the plan from the beginning.
Digital inclusion is not simply supplying tools. It means planning with excluded people, removing practical barriers, and sharing decisions across communities, educators, policymakers, and researchers from the beginning.
A derivative work by Paperi · AI-generated script, voice and captions
· pages and figures unaltered
Made with Paperi.
Drop in a research PDF — get a narrated video walkthrough like this one,
with highlights that follow the narration. Free to start.
Per‐Einar Binder, Hanna Heggen, Elisabeth Buer Vase, Gro Mjeldheim Sandal
Imagine growing up with one set of expectations at home and another outside, and feeling like a stranger in both places. This study finds that painful position can also become a source of unusual strength.What happens when belonging to one culture does not cancel out belonging to another? This study finds that young refugees in Norway can feel like outsiders in both worlds, yet that tension can also create a uniquely open perspective.
Matthew Loria, DAVID R. GILBERT, Tomasz Tabernacki, Mart Andrew Maravillas, Megan Ann McNamara, Shubham Gupta, Kirtishri Mishra
For transgender women, gender-affirming surgery does not remove the prostate. This study finds prostate cancer is less common than in cisgender men, but still common enough that it cannot simply be ignored.The prostate remains after gender-affirming surgery, so prostate cancer risk does not disappear. Yet the incidence in transgender women has been poorly understood, and this large analysis finds lower risk, but not zero risk.
Mai SeifElDin Abdeen, Mostafa Ahmad Hashim, Marwa Mohamed Ghanem, Nouran Yousef Salah, Zeinab Mohamed El Nagar
During the pandemic, official reports of child harm went down, but that did not necessarily mean children were safer. A survey of Egyptian parents found a much darker picture inside the home.During the COVID-19 pandemic, official reports of child maltreatment went down even as concerns about risk went up. This study asks parents directly what happened inside Egyptian homes.