Effectiveness and Safety of the MVA–BN Vaccine against Mpox in At-Risk Individuals in the United States (USMVAc)
Curious4:36CCAI
paperi.ai
0:00 / 0:00
Soowoo Back, Bethany Knox, Ciara Coakley, Nicolas Deltour, Emmanuelle Jacquot, Hanaya Raad, Elizabeth M. Garry
Mpox seemed to fade from the headlines, but the risk did not disappear. In U.S. health records, people who received both recommended vaccine doses had far less mpox than similar unvaccinated people.
The mpox 2022 outbreak was declared a public health emergency in July 2022. In August 2022, the MVA–BN vaccine received emergency use authorization in the United States (US) to target at-risk groups. This study (EUPAS104386) used HealthVerity’s administrative US healthcare data to generate real-world evidence for MVA–BN vaccine effectiveness and safety to prevent mpox disease in men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women, the most affected population during the 2022 mpox outbreak. Fully vaccinated subjects (two doses ≥28 days apart) were initially matched with five unvaccinated subjects on calendar date, age, US region, and insurance type. Subjects were followed from index date (14 days after the second dose) until death or data end to ascertain mpox occurrence. After propensity score adjustment, the MVA–BN vaccine effectiveness against mpox disease was 89% (95% CI: 12%, 99%) among those fully vaccinated; attenuated to 64% (95% CI: 40%, 78%) among those with any dose and 70% (95% CI: 44%, 84%) for those with only a single dose. One pericarditis adverse event of special interest was observed when the risk window was extended to 28 days. These results contribute to the totality of evidence supporting the favorable benefit/risk profile of the MVA–BN vaccine.
Transcript
Mpox seemed to fade from the headlines, but the risk did not disappear. In U.S. health records, people who received both recommended vaccine doses had far less mpox than similar unvaccinated people.
Mpox had once been linked mainly to travel, but in 2022 the United States experienced 30,344 cases and 42 deaths—about one-third of the global outbreak. Most U.S. cases occurred among men and transgender people who have sex with men.
The emergency ended, but more than 91,000 human-to-human infections since 2022, rising infections among unvaccinated people, and a resurgence in the Democratic Republic of the Congo all point to a continuing need for preventive vaccination. The concern is not only the past outbreak: a related form of the virus causes more severe illness, so public-health agencies continue to stress preparedness even though it has not been detected in the United States.
To answer whether vaccination worked outside a tightly controlled trial, the study used ordinary U.S. healthcare records to examine protection and safety among vaccinated men who have sex with men and transgender women. That makes the question practical: does the vaccine help people in everyday healthcare, not only under research conditions?
The comparison worked like checking two lines at a store: for each vaccinated person, the study found similar unvaccinated people, matching them by date, age group, region, and insurance type. The unvaccinated comparison group had no record of receiving the vaccine by that matching date, and was matched on calendar date, age group, region, and insurance type.
The central result was a lower risk of mpox among fully vaccinated people than among similar unvaccinated people. Estimated vaccine effectiveness was 89 percent. Among people living with HIV and receiving treatment, the result suggested similar protection, but the uncertainty was wide.
The study could not report a clear difference between people with and without HIV prevention medication in the subgroup without HIV. This filtering reduced a large at-risk population to 163 fully vaccinated patients, each paired with five unvaccinated patients—815 in all.
That careful narrowing matters because the later vaccine comparison rests on groups made similar and complete enough to compare fairly. But here is the catch: protection was lower when the analysis included anyone with any dose, at 64 percent, and it was 70 percent among people with only one dose.
For people older than 50 who were assumed to have had an earlier smallpox vaccine, the study found no evidence of protection from a single dose. The safety result was reassuring within the study’s specified time windows: no safety events occurred among vaccinated people or their matched comparison group after at least one dose.
When the window for heart inflammation was extended to 28 days, one such event was identified among vaccinated people. That finding is important to monitor, but it was a single event in this analysis. There is an important limit to what these records can tell us.
They did not include people’s sexual orientation, gender identity, clinical notes, or other documentation to confirm how participants were classified. If some unvaccinated men did not share the same risk profile as the vaccinated group, mpox could have been undercounted among them, making the vaccine appear more effective than it was.
The researchers used high-risk criteria based on earlier mpox studies, and related studies in Germany collect this information directly from participants to complement these records. Taken together, the results add to evidence that the vaccine works and is safe, while the estimates remain imprecise because the study was small.
The strongest protection appeared among people who received both recommended doses. For someone deciding what to do, the practical message is clear: completing the two-dose course offered the greatest effectiveness seen in this study.
The study found strong protection after two doses, with weaker evidence after only one, and no safety events in the main safety window. For people at risk, completing vaccination matters while protection efforts continue.
A derivative work by Paperi · AI-generated script, voice and captions
· pages and figures unaltered
Made with Paperi.
Drop in a research PDF — get a narrated video walkthrough like this one,
with highlights that follow the narration. Free to start.
Mazdak Sanaei Nurmi, Laura Pérez‐Alós, Peter Garred, Bengt Fellström, Katja Gabrysch, Sigrid Lundberg
A kidney biopsy gives doctors a snapshot of damage, but it carries risks. This study asks whether urine can reveal something more useful: whether kidney disease is active now, or quietly leaving lasting scars.A urine sample may carry two different signals in IgA kidney disease: PTX-3 and MBL may point to active proliferative lesions, while C4c may point toward chronic damage and future decline.
Branka Bajić, Oskar Werb, Ivana Budinski, Jelena Blagojević, Juliane Schaer, Jaap van Schaik
A bat can carry a hidden infection without giving researchers an easy way to check. This study finds that the bat fly riding on its body can act like a tiny, non-invasive warning signal.What if researchers could survey bat infections without drawing blood from the bats themselves? This study shows how the bats’ own tiny, blood-feeding flies can reveal widespread and genetically diverse Polychromophilus parasites.
When standard leukemia treatments fall short, the body may already have another weapon: immune cells that can recognize and attack cancer without needing the same target as other immune therapies.CLL treatments have improved, but high-risk disease and drug resistance remain serious problems. This review asks whether natural killer cells can provide a more flexible way to attack leukemia.